Friday, December 30, 2011

Humor from the Internet

How to Start Each Day With a Positive Outlook

1. Open a new file in your computer.

2. Name it “Barack Obama.”

3. Send it to the trash.

4. Empty the trash.

5. Your PC will ask you, “Do you really want to get rid of “Barack Obama?”

6. Firmly Click “Yes.”

7. Feel better?

PS: Tomorrow we’ll do Nancy Pelosi, the next Harry Reid, then Patty Murry, then...

EVE'S SIDE OF THE STORY

After three weeks in the Garden of Eden, God came to visit Eve. 'So, how
is everything going ?' inquired God.

'It is all so beautiful, God,' she replied. 'The sunrises and sunsets are
breathtaking, the smells, the sights, everything is wonderful, but I have
just one problem.

It's these breasts you have given me. The middle one pushes the other two
out and I am constantly knocking them with my arms, catching them on
branches and snagging them on bushes. They're a real pain.'

And Eve went on to tell God that since many other parts of her body came in
pairs, such as her limbs, eyes, ears, etc She felt that having only two
breasts might leave her body more 'symmetrically balanced'.

'That's a fair point,' replied God, 'But it was my first shot at this, you
know. I gave the animals six breasts, so I figured that you needed only
half of those, but I see that you are right. I will fix it up right away.'

And God reached down, removed the middle breast and tossed it into the
bushes.
Three weeks passed and God once again visited Eve in the Garden of Eden.
'Well, Eve, how is my favorite creation ?'
'Just fantastic,' she replied, 'But for one oversight. You see, all the animals are paired off. The ewe has a ram and the cow has her bull. All the animals have a mate except me. I feel so alone.'

God thought for a moment and said, 'You know, Eve, you are right. How could
I have overlooked this? You do need a mate and I will immediately create a
man from a part of you. Let's see....where did I put that useless boob?'

Now doesn't THAT make more sense than the rib story?
I think I'd better read Genesis again, I might have missed something.
Thoughtsjustoffcenter: There is stuff out there, in the "ether world" that can make you smile. Just thought I would pass it on to whomever reads this blog. Have a wonderful day! 

Global Warming / Climate Change

If you find yourself without facts and concepts to discuss and refute man-caused global warming or “climate change” as nonsense read the following:
Water vapor is a better absorber of heat energy, IR, than CO2 by a factor of seven and has 30 to 100 times as many molecules in air that generate 210 to 700 times as much atmospheric heat as CO2. Water vapor does 99.96% to 99.99% of all atmospheric heating. Why should we stop using our best, most convenient, abundant, lowest cost form of energy to quell 0.01% to 0.04% of atmospheric heating? The Medieval Warming period was the happiest in history. 500 years of peace and prosperity. Why is this nonsense happening?

The control and taxing of carbon and carbon dioxide would give the elected ruling class more money and power than anything in history. For them and the 40% of our people wanting more government so they get “benefits" by “taxing the rich” and "spreading the wealth around," could make it happen! They ignore that such policies have never worked as crushing initiative with taxes means everyone has less. No better example of the failure of socialism can be seen than on our Indian reservations in spite of support or more likely, because of it.

We do not use the politically correct term “native American” as anyone born here is a “native American.” “Indian” is a misnomer while “indigenous” and “aboriginal” are not accurate. English does not have a name for people who walked here from Asia and Europe. Groups from both continents arrived during the last ice age, as Clovis point studies confirm. It was possible to walk or shore navigate, fishing, hunting and gathering all the way. We need a new term like Nomadians, Wanderians or Squatians

Man makes so little CO2 compared to nature cutting our portion would net nothing even if it were a good absorber of IR. Earth produces 166 billion tons (gigatons) of CO2 every year. 160 gigatons come from the decomposition of limestone and dead stuff. Of the six gigatons made by man America makes 20% or 1.2 gigatons, but with it we make 50% of the world’s fuel, fiber, food and manufactured goods. The Green-a-zoids want us to cut our production of CO2 by 80% or by 0.96 gigatons, but of the 166 gigaton total that is only 0.57%, a statistically insignificant portion of the total of which 96% is produced naturally and CO2 is the vapor tiger.

by Adrian Vance, from "The Two Minute Conservative"

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: For those of you that jumped on the band wagon, I hope you have had the time to do some of your own research on the subject of "Global Warming." There is so much information out there that refutes the claims. Al Gore should be a "stand-up" guy and tell everyone that he has been proven wrong. Yet, as a politician, he can't do that because it will make people think of other things that have been wrong, that he's pointed out to us - like he deserves to be President.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Payroll Taxes - Spin & Truth


By Rick Manning

Obama and his cronies are good at one thing — telling a lie consistently enough so that it is continuously reported and eventually believed. They know that the only reality in politics is what people believe to be true, not what actually is true.

The payroll tax issue is a perfect example of this axiom.

For better or worse, the House of Representatives passed a yearlong extension of the payroll tax cut well before the Senate ever brought the issue up.

Republicans in the House chose to extend it for a year because that creates certainty and avoids costly retooling of various payroll calculation systems that U.S. businesses depend upon to provide their employees paychecks.

They also chose to extend it for a year, because that time period allows whatever stimulative effect the tax cut might have time to succeed.

Harry Reid's Senate, on the other hand, chose to pass a two-month extension of the tax cut. The Senate extension sows instability into the system, and guarantees another trip to the precipice of legislative indecision in February, when the same senators who demand a two-month extension will likely fall all over themselves pushing for a 10-month additional extension.

Yet it is Republicans in the House who are painted as the ones who don't want the extension.

What a crock!

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

US Warned - Another Debt Burden Threat Downgrade

Fitch Ratings on Wednesday warned again that the United States’ rising debt burden was not consistent with maintaining the country’s top AAA credit rating, but said there would likely be no decision on whether to cut the rating before 2013.

Last month, Fitch changed its U.S. credit rating outlook to negative from stable, citing the failure of a special congressional committee to agree on at least $1.2 trillion in deficit-reduction measures.

“Federal debt will rise in the absence of expenditure and tax reforms that would address the challenges of rising health and social security spending as the population ages,” Fitch said in a statement.
Continue Reading at:  www.cnbc.com

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Comments from Const40 ring so true: Just more proof that this administrations “rule” of “let no crisis go to waste” is continuing to let everything go till the last minute then acting in panic mode. We ‘must’ do this now! The government will shut down, the government will be in default etc etc.

The law that the Senate must make a budget each year has been disregarded since the last presidential election. That creates more ‘crises’ for this administration to ‘save’ us from.
This administration truely believes the public is SO ignorant!

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

A post concerning Presidential Candidate Ron Paul, from “Vision to America”

by John R. Vigil, MD

December 19th, 2011 at 1:09 pm I was surprised to see the results of the Fox News Poll showing Ron Paul leading in who the pollsters thought would win the Iowa caucus vote. While, I consider myself a conservative and lean more towards libertarianism, I am nonetheless, quite frankly concerned about the possibility of Ron Paul winning the primaries and–God forbid–possibly becoming president of the United States. My concern comes as a fellow physician who believes that Dr. Paul suffers from a real psychological disorder characterized by megalomania, narcissism, delusional thinking, paranoia, antisocial characteristics, and (abnormal) feelings of persecution. Now, I am not a psychiatrist, but I did minor in psychology as an undergraduate and most physicians have been educated in the behavioral sciences and have been trained to diagnose common psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, it is estimated that the incidence of Narcissistic Personality Disorder occurs 34 times more often in medical doctors than in the general population.

Over the last several weeks, I have been studying Dr. Paul as well as his followers through his television appearances, his letters (and Newsletters), social media, and video clips from You-tube and have noted a very disturbing pattern of Dr. Paul showing all of the psycopathological characteristics of a genuine “cult leader” and his followers showing all of the characteristics of a cult. I have studied cults and their leaders and have outlined the “five basic rules” of being a cult leader. I have also indicated the psychopathology associated with cult leaders as they form their cults:

The number one rule of a cult leader is to polish and cultivate a persona that you–and only you–have been chosen, anointed, or have achieved spiritual, political, or intellectual enlightenment above all others. This shows features of megalomania, delusions of grandeur, as well as narcissism -

1. Dr. Paul has tried to cultivate this persona for over 30 years as the “outsider” and enlightened one within the “Washington establishment”.

2. Dr. Paul has publicly stated that while he believes in term limits, they do not apply to him because (paraphrasing) “there is no one good enough to bring in to replace him”.

3. In 2010, Dr. Paul commented to his wife that he would run for President in 2012 “if things were happening so quickly and fast in our country and we were in a crisis period…and needed somebody…with the knowledge he as, he would do it”.

4. Dr. Paul presents in interviews as haughty and stern and seems to be lecturing rather than engaging in conversation.


The next rule is to appeal to the disconnected, disenchanted, and disaffected in society who are often intellectually, politically, and emotionally immature (i.e., younger people)and convince them that while you have been “chosen” (or more likely self-selected) you are (almost) human just like them and can empathize with their disenchantment and discontent. This shows more tendencies of narcissism and ego-feeding by someone who sees them self as inherently better than others, but with a need to surround one’s self with those less fortunate or less “enlightened”—a “savior complex”, if you will. Often times, the empathy and compassion shown to the acolytes is not genuine (which is a feature of antisocial personality) and is only used for the ulterior motive of personal gain in sex, money, or power (or sense of superiority) or combination thereof -

1. Dr. Paul has always had a relatively small number of fanatical followers who have mostly been drawn from younger people in society. He routinely targets schools, colleges, and other events where younger people tend to be.

2. His “populist” message today resonates with many, besides young people as social, geopolitical, and economic turmoil are perceived to be worsening and more and more people become disenfranchised, disenchanted, and discontent.

3. Dr. Paul’s ploy of not accepting Medicare payment for his Medicare services or a congressional pension—while on the surface seem like noble gestures—are really means to portray himself as “one of us” and morally higher than his colleagues.

The third step is through indoctrination, coercion, repetition, and/or isolation to exercise mind control over your flock of followers by relieving them of their ability to think rationally (usually by not allowing them to test your theories or have access to “the outside”)—but not emotionally—while simultaneously convincing them that your ideas—while plausible (but generally at the far fringes of mainstream thought) are the “light and the truth”. This shows more elements of antisocial ego-building in that the leader is now getting others to surrender their will and rational thought against deep seated norms of the self and/or society while they align their thinking towards that of the leader. Furthermore, this shows the disordered or delusional thinking of the leader who generally has delusional thinking of the world and how it operates and he or she is the only one with the power to fix it -

1. Dr. Paul plays on the emotions of his followers by carefully crafting plausible—and easy to understand– (but highly improbable and at the fringes of mainstream thought) scenarios out of complex geopolitical, political, social and economic issues that are at “top of mind” of our society and that tug at some of our most basic interests (individual freedom, economic freedom, nationalism, sanctity of life, torture, and war) and evoke very basic human responses such as fear, anxiety, anger, disgust, and etc.

2. Dr. Paul’s views on national defense, monetary policy, isolationism, and constitutionalism are considered by most to be outside of the mainstream of rational political, social, and governmental philosophy.

3. Dr. Paul has consistently repeated his messages over 30 years and as noted above, tends to target younger followers who are easier to indoctrinate.
The fourth rule is to proselytize not only your “enlightened philosophy or beliefs, but also to spread forth the word that while you and your followers are “the enlightened or chosen ones”, there will be naysayers and those that will persecute you and the movement. This clearly shows the elements of paranoia and persecution by the non-believers.
Dr. Paul's followers -

1. Dr. Paul and his followers are very defensive when challenged on the issues and their beliefs. Instead of engaging in earnest discourse, they tend to attack and accuse the “non-believer” as persecuting them for their beliefs or of being ignorant and unenlightened in their philosophy.

2. Dr. Paul and his followers display a common paranoia and decry a “conspiracy” of the right, the political elite, and the left against them and their “lofty ideas that will save America”.

3. Dr. Paul has consistently offered the explanation that others are simply “out to get him” by taking “tongue-in-cheek comments out of context” and things that were written in his newsletters (but purportedly not authorized or written by him).

4. Dr. Paul comes off as defensive and angry when challenged in interviews and becomes condescending.

The fifth and last rule is to convince your followers that it is only through blind faith and rigid adherence to your philosophy—no matter how foreign it may be to self or to society—that that blind adherence or “loyalty” is the only path to salvation, redemption, or the reparation of the “perceived” ills of society. This is more antisocial ego-building and the tightening of control over the flock -

Dr. Paul and his followers play the same monotonous drum beat about “smaller government”, defense of our borders, monetary reform and fiscal responsibility, “stop the wars”, and national isolationism over and over again like a Gregorian chant and mantra in a blind and stubborn adherence to their fringe philosophy that is the only path to saving America despite practical, rational, philosophical, and real world evidence against and “common sense” opposition to their “zany” ideas, Messianic messages, and Utopian philosophies.

Some authors would add another step which is to construct a “doomsday scenario” for your followers, such as “the end of the world, World War III, or economic collapse as the great incentive to motivate the followers to adhere to and spread your teachings.

This, again, would show delusional thinking as well as narcissistic thinking, especially if the leader and his or her followers will be the only ones saved from the impending calamity.

By the way, I too am a Vietnam Era Vet (Army)and also served as an officer in the medical corp for the National Guard during Desert Storm and there is no way in hell I would ever support Dr. Paul to be my Commander-in Chief!


Thoughtsjustoffcenter: I too have conducted research concerning Dr. Ron Paul and came to the conclusion that I don't want him as President of the USA either. A well written article, yet PLEASE don't let this stop you from doing your own research.

Monday, December 26, 2011

Just Who Is Barack Obama? (2)

Where are Barack Obama’s Girlfriends?

Think about this e-mail and see if there’s anything here you don’t believe!

I hadn’t thought about this – but where are Obama’s past girl-friends surely he had at least one orfor that matter any friends period? No past girlfriends popping up anywhere? Strange, very strange to the point of being downright weird and crazy.
OK, this is just plain old common sense, no political agendas for either side. Just common knowledge for citizens of a country, especially American citizens, who know every little tidbit about every other president (and their wives) that even know that Andrew Jackson’s wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery, or that Lincoln never went to school or Kennedy wore a back brace, or Truman played the piano.

We are Americans! Our media vets these things out! We are known for our humanitarian interests and caring for our ‘fellow man.’ We care, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.

Honestly, and this is a personal thing, but it’s continuing to bug me that no one who ever dated him has ever shown up.

Taken his charisma, which caused the women to be drawn to him so obviously during his campaign, looks like some lady would not have missed the opportunity to meet him or date him.

We all know about JFK’s magnetism, McCain was no monk, Palin’s courtship and even her athletic prowess were probed. Biden’s aneurisms are no secret. Look at Cheney and Clinton – we all know about their heart problems. How could I have left out Wild Bill before or during the White House?

Nope… not one lady has stepped up and said, “He was so shy,” or “What a great dancer!"

Now look at the rest of what we do know: no classmates, not even the recorder for the Columbia class notes ever heard of him.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Check for groomsmen. Pictures? Everyone has pictures of their wedding. Then get the pictures, or camera footage, of the graduation ceremony.

Has anyone talked to the any of the professors or why haven’t they stepped forward to tell what a great student he was – or not? Isn’t it odd that no one is bragging that they knew him, lived with him, or lived next door to him?

When did he meet Michele and how? Are there photos? Every president provides the public with all their photos, etc. for their library. What has he released? Nada – other than what was in this so-called biography! And experts, who study writing styles etc., claim it was not O’s own words or typical of his speech patterns, etc.

Does this make any of you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama’s past, saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc? NOT ONE PERSON has ever come forward.

Michelle doesn’t even talk about it. This should really be a cause for great concern.

Did you see the movie titled, The Manchurian Candidate?

Let’s face it. As insignificant as we all are, someone whom we went to school with remembers our name or face, someone remembers we were the clown, the dork, the brain, the quiet one, the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos, ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. Even George questions why no one has acknowledged that the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos was a classmate of Obama at Columbia-class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him. Since he is such a great orator, why doesn’t anyone in Obama’s college class remember him? And, why won’t he allow Columbia to release his records? Do you like millions of others; simply assume all this is explainable – even though no one can?

NOBODY REMEMBERS OBAMA AT COLUMBIA
Looking for evidence of Obama’s past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but not one remembers him. For example,Wayne Allyn Root was (like Obama) a political science major at Columbia , who graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, “I don’t know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don’t have a single classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia … EVER!

NOBODY RECALLS HIM

Root adds that he was, “Class of ’83 political science, pre-law” and says, “You don’t get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don’t know anyone who ever met him.” At our 20th class reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who’s kind of the, as we say in New York, ‘The Macha’ who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."

Obama’s photograph does not appear in the school’s yearbook, and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia. Odds are, we are in at least one of the (4-years of) class year books of where we went to school, why isn't he?

HOW CAN THIS BE
NOTE: Wayne Allyn Root can easily be verified. He graduated valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School, and then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major in the same ’83 class in which Barack Hussein Obama states he was.

SOME OTHER INTERESTING QUESTIONS
Why was Obama’s law license inactivated in 2002?

Why was Michelle’s law license inactivated by court order?

According to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama – but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases.

WHAT?

The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived.

Criminally, it’s no wonder why all his records are sealed!

Please continue sending this out to everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school, before he “reorganized” Chicago, and burst upon the scene at the 2004 DemocRATic Convention, and made everyone swoon because of his charm, poise, and speaking pizzazz.

Where are his passports, how did he travel to countries that the U.S. State Department had on it's 'Do Not Travel' - 'No Travel Allowed' lists for U.S. Citizens?

This has to be the biggest cons this country has ever seen, and everyone is letting him get away with it.

This is Crazy-Scary on many levels!

Thoughtsjustoffcenter comments: Received in my email. I edited a little. These are questions that should be easy to answer, Yet, the answers can not be found. Why not? I will continue to publish this article every month, throughout the Presidential Campaign Season. Hopefully I won't forget, like a lot of the American Public.

9th Circuit Judges Dismiss Election Fraud Case Against Obams - Because He's Been Sworn In

By Bob Unruh @ wnd.com on December 22, 2011

The judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals have ruled that the election froud suspected in the 2008 presidential campaign essentially was canceled by the inauguration of Barack Obama.

The ruling comes in a lawsuit that was filed on the same day Obama was inaugurated in Washington by a team of taxpayers, voters, presidential candidates, members of the military and others who alleged Obama failed to meet the Constitution's requirements for the presidency.

The case represents the work of two groups of plaintiffs, one led by lawyer Orly Taitz and the other by attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation.
Taitz said her plaintiffs definitely will pursue further action, probably a request for rehearing at two levels of federal court, while Kreep told WND he was working with his clients on the results, and they soon would make a decision regarding an appeal

The issue was the "standing" of the groups bringing the complaint against Obama. The district court essentially said nobody had standing to bring a complaint, but the appellate judges said the individuals who were politically connected to the race should hold an interest in a fair outcome – including whether there was an ineligible candidate aboard the ticket.

The individuals were Alan Keyes and Wiley S. Drake, candidates for the White House on the American Independent Party ticket in California; Gail Lightfoot, a member of the California Libertarian Party; who was a write-in candidate; and Markham Robinson, a certified California elector for the American Independent Party.

The judges' panel observed: "These plaintiffs argue that they have standing because, as candidates running against Obama in the 2008 election, they had an interest in having a fair competition. … If Obama entered the presidential race without meeting the requirements for the office, they contend, the candidates did not have a fair opportunity to obtain votes in their favor."

The opinion from judges Harry Pregerson, Ray Fisher and Marsha Berzon explained the concept is called "competitive standing," and they affirmed it as legitimate grounds for concern.

"This notion of 'competitive standing' has been recognized by several circuits," the opinion said. "We, too, have upheld the notion of 'competitive standing.' In Owen v. Mulligan, we held that the 'potential loss of an election' was an injury-in-fact sufficient to give a local candidate and Republican party officials standing. In that case, the candidate for local office sued the Postal Service for giving his rival a preferential mailing rate, in violation of its own regulations."

The opinion said the case had the candidate and party officials seeking "to prevent their opponent from gaining an unfair advantage."

However, in Obama's case, the court panel simply said once the inauguration was held, the claims evaporated.

"The original complaint was filed on Jan. 20, 2009, at 3:26 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, after President Obama was officially sworn is as president," the judges wrote. "Once the 2008 election was over and the president sworn in, Keyes, Drake and Lightfoot were no longer 'candidates' for the 2008 general election. Moreover, they have not alleged any interest in running against President Obama in the future.

"Therefore, none of the plaintiffs could claim that they would be injured by the 'potential loss of an election,'" the court said.

Actually, Obama flubbed the Jan. 20 public oath, and retook it later, out of public view, according to the White House.

Continued at: World News Daily

Thoughtsjustoffcenter comments: WTH! This is treason by these judges. HELLO Congress - when are you going to start impeachment proceedings? Of both the 9th Circuit and Obama.

I gues the logic used here is: Well, yes he did cheat, but we didn't catch him before he got away, so how can we say, even though he was seen cheating, you didn't catch him (at the time), so since he not cheating, in that aspect anymore, we don't hold him to account for it.

What a bunch of losers! You and I would never get away with it. So how can he?

CONGRESS - DO YOU DARN JOBS! IMPEACH THE IMPOSTER!

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Passed on to You - from Me and Liberty Counsel

Christmas is not only about celebrating the birth of Christ, but is also about worshipping the newborn King.

When Jesus was born, the Heavenly Host worshipped God! Later in Luke’s second chapter, we read that the shepherds were in complete awe and worshipped. Simeon and Anna both worshipped God. And, of course, the Wise Men (or Magi) worshipped the newborn King with their gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.

Praise and adoration for Jesus, Christ the Lord, Emmanuel, is what we enjoy most about Christmas.

Anita and I wish you and yours abundant blessings in this season of celebrating the birth of the Christ child and worshipping Him – the Alpha and Omega, Who was, and is, and is to come.

God bless you and may you have a Merry Christmas!

Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

Saturday, December 24, 2011

From Personal Liberty Digest - Enjoy a Laugh


Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Sometimes warped too!

Represenative Allen West's On Attorney General Eric Holder's Use of Racism


“I’m disgusted. I find it absolutely reprehensible because this is not about skin color. This is about your character. This is about your competence. This is about your ability to lead. And this is about potentially you having misled the Congress and the American people on this operation Fast and Furious,” Rep. Allen West (R-FL) told NRA News.

Why did Rep. West have such strong words for attorney general Eric Holder?

Recently, the calls for Holder‘s resignation on Capitol Hill have increased as the investigation into the ATF’s “Fast and Furious” gunrunning probe intensifies. Perhaps overwhelmed by the growing pressure, Holder tried to explain the that “more extreme segment” of his critics were going after him because of his race.

“This is a way to get at the president because of the way I can be identified with him, both due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that we’re both African-American,” Holder said in an interview with The New York Times.

However, many argue that race has nothing to do with the growing–and increasingly heated–criticism Holder has faced recently.

“I think it’s fair criticism. When you look at Fast and Furious … when you look at guns ending up in the hands of drug lords and criminals south of the border, I think that’s fair criticism,” J.C. Watts, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma, told Fox News.

An African American himself, Watts warned against injecting race into the issue.
“I think it cheapens and it weakens the legitimate claims of racism,” he said. “I think racism is obviously alive and well, but I think it cheapens it when we so quickly and in such cavalier ways, we often jump to that. Now I‘m not saying that the attorney general’s being cavalier. … He probably honestly feels like that.”

Watts‘ criticism of Holder’s introduction of racism into the discussion pales in comparison to the words West had for the attorney general.

“It is a slap in my face as a professional African American member of Congress and a career military officer, that this gentleman who is the head of the Department of Justice is going to resort to that very nefarious theme of the race card,” West said.


Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Nothing more needs to be said by Mr. Holder, other than: "Yes, Mr. President, that is my resignation." When are we going to get away from all this Hyphenated-American stuff. It is one of the causes of all this racist junk. WE ARE AMERICANS. And at that, Mr. Allen West is an outstanding American!

Friday, December 23, 2011

What Ron Paul Thinks Of America

Ron Paul’s supporters are sure of one thing: Their candidate has always been consistent—a point Dr. Paul himself has been making with increasing frequency. It’s a thought that comes up with a certain inevitability now in those roundtables on the Republican field. One cable commentator genially instructed us last Friday, “You have to give Paul credit for sticking to his beliefs.”

He was speaking, it’s hardly necessary to say, of a man who holds some noteworthy views in a candidate for the presidency of the United States. One who is the best-known of our homegrown propagandists for our chief enemies in the world. One who has made himself a leading spokesman for, and recycler of, the long and familiar litany of charges that point to the United States as a leading agent of evil and injustice, the militarist victimizer of millions who want only to live in peace.

Hear Dr. Paul on the subject of the 9/11 terror attacks—an event, he assures his audiences, that took place only because of U.S. aggression and military actions. True, we’ve heard the assertions before. But rarely have we heard in any American political figure such exclusive concern for, and appreciation of, the motives of those who attacked us—and so resounding a silence about the suffering of those thousands that the perpetrators of 9/11 set out so deliberately to kill.

Continued at: online.wsj.com

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Hello, Ron Paul supporters! Research you canidate - PLEASE.
If I have to, I'll vote for him, yet I will not be happy about it.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Ron Paul - Hum, Nope, I Don't Think So!


Here is the homepage for the Conservative Network

They have collected a series of articles, videos, and statements made by Ron Paul that show that this is NOT a person that we want as the President of the United States of America.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Political Humor

Twelve Days of Christmas



Thoughtsjustoffcenter: You can use the 'You Tube' link or the video - your choice. I have to put some humor in here, as the administration is making turning me into a "frowny face."

The Truth Behind Ron Paul

While conducting some reasearch on the internet, I came across the following that is attributed to Ron Paul, running for the Republican nomination for President.

Is this going to be another Presidential Campaign where: I'm not going to really look at a persons history just because I like what I'm hearing (though I don't like what I hear from him) by the American public.

Hasn't anyone figured out that that type of voter behavior doesn't work?

Please - Please - Please - Do your homework!

I know I have questions that I want answers to, Do You?

Conservatives Network - About Ron Paul

The question I have to ask is: "Who is behind the Conservatives Network?" I'm not saying that what they are publishing is not truthful, yet everything needs looking into on something as serious as the Presidency of the United States of America. Hopefully people have learned that popularity contest really don't work for this position.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Things that Piss You Off and More Things that Piss You Off


More from my friend at: Cowboys & Teas Parties December 20, 2011

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: How much is the "American Public" going to allow this administration to rip off them off with all this "Green Energy" hoopla? Global warming is a way for the rich to get richer and control the population. They have placed people in power that will have an adverse effect upon the "American Public" for many years to come. They will be in positions of special trust where they can create the most damage - the Supreme Court is just a place to do that. Use your critical thinking caps.

Unemployment Rate

According to former U.S. Labor Secretary, Robert Reich, employment needs to grow by at least 90,000 a month just to keep up with the growth of the population. But, since the fall of 2008, the civilian labor force has actually shrunk from 154.7 million to 153.8 million, a contraction of about 900,000.
 
It's not that fertility suddenly dropped or there was a massive plague. It should have grown by 3.24 million since then, but it didn't. Which means working age adults are simply not being counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS.

They are fudging the numbers.

Adding the 900,000 contraction to the expected growth, the total civilian labor force should be 4.14 million larger than is being counted, at about 157.94 million by now. And the unemployed should be about that much more larger, since if they could be counted as working, BLS would most certainly be counting them.

So, the amount of unemployed should really be measured at about 17.443 million, instead of 13.303 million, or a rate of 11.04 percent instead of 8.6 percent. And the underemployed rate should be about 17.8 percent instead of 15.6 percent, with 28.145 million people looking for full-time work that cannot find it.

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Heck YES, they're fudging the numbers - I call it outright LIEING! When are people going to WAKE UP! If you look at the actual number from the Department of Labor, you'll find the hidden number of 16.4 percent. Yup, it's there, you've just got to look for it in Table A-15. What's that saying? "Number can lie, just like a Statistician," or what the District Attorney  once told us (El Paso, TX): I can get a Peanut Butter sandwich indicted, the problem is, can I make it stick." So watch those numbers!

Monday, December 19, 2011

Boehner Opposes Two-Month Extension to Payroll-Tax Cut

- - A Continuation of "The Constitution of the United States of America - -

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) said Sunday he opposes the two-month extension of payroll-tax breaks and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate, throwing into doubt the prospects of a quick fix to the year-end partisan dispute.

In an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Mr. Boehner suggested the House wouldn’t take up the two-month deal approved overwhelmingly by the Senate in a rare Saturday session. Instead, he proposed that a House-Senate conference resolve their differences over a bill passed by the House earlier this month to extend the measures for a full year.

“It’s pretty clear I and our members oppose the Senate bill,” Mr. Boehner said. “I believe two months is just kicking the can down the road."

In a warning to both Senate Republicans and Democrats, he said that “it’s time for the Senate to work with the House to complete our business for the year. We’ve got two weeks to get it done, let’s do it the right way.”

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Comments from the intranet -

1. Way to go Mr. Speaker. Thank you for bringing some clarity to this situation. The Obama administration just wants to delay real action in the hopes of no action. America needs the pipeline jobs and movement away from Obama's Nanny-State visions.

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: It's about time he has started to stand up to the Senate and not waver.

2. Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this is the fact that Reid has adjourned the Senate, he claims, while in fact - according to the Constitution, which we know he cherishes, he cannot adjourn without the approval of the House. Does anyone smell something fishy.

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Very true. Article 1. Section 5.

3. You know a lot of people don't like the Speaker, but I think he is doing a good job, when he stands for something he don't back down, and I can't believe it's a cake walk to work with Cowboy Poet Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and Obama.You can't work with someone without a brain.

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: He could do a much better job. I'm glad to see that it's past the time to start doing one.

4. These foolish tax breaks don't stimulate investment and create jobs. Do I like the extra money? Sure I do, but we are financing it with IOUs to the SS Administration. We have enough problems there already. The money does not make a significant difference in my standard of living, and I don't believe it will for most who receive it. As far as extending the unemployment benefits, that is sheer folly. Fix the immigration problem by making it impossible for illegals to get jobs. They will self-deport, then there will be plenty of jobs for those who want to work. Those who don't want to work, deserve nothing! All we have done with extended unemployment benefits is created a new kind of welfare. Washington is full of fools - both sides of the isle. The spending on social programs has got to stop or we will be the next Greece!

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Agreed!

5. Boehner is right!! No to more unemployment benefits. And this "tax cut" gives pennies a day but involves a cut in the Social Security tax. I thought the SS fund was in trouble? Why not ask the Fed for a REAL break - like no taxes at the gas pump? Stand back - see the games? The DC "occupiers" call this work? Hey, Demwits: How about every last legal USA citizen in the same programs & same rules! A vested interest in solutions to OUR problems! 1) New Tax Plan (flat tax - public fringes & perks - trips, conferences, holidays/sick pay beyond the private average, etc. are included in public's salary/wage base); 2) Balanced Budget Amendment - zero-based annually; 3) Universal Retirement-Rules Plan (all present & former public employees - elected, appointed &/or hired - are now subject to the same rules & provisions as the private sector); 4) NO PERSON shall be allowed to hold a public &/or private position that may influence public policy for a duration of at least 5-years after the year in which he/she has vacated a public position, for whatever reason (Only exception would be VETERANS!).

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: I agree, this is a good start (Flat Tax and Balance Budget Ammendment and definitely Item 4 - - if you haven't stood up to protect and defend the USA you shouldn't be allowed to serve in a public position because you haven't given anything of yourself to the American people.

The Constitution of the United States of America, Article 1, Section 7

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

ThoughtsjustoffCenter: Just what does the above statement mean to you? It appears the Senate is the one that is making up the bills concerning revenue and telling the House of Representatives that it must concur in order to move on with the Nations other business.

Isn’t it about time that “The People” hold, both, Houses responsible for their action, or inaction, for not doing the job the American people have hired them to do. First of all, following the Constitution!

The Senators, which “We the People” have elected/hired, need to be fired!

Sunday, December 18, 2011

New Haven, CT., Mayor John DeStefano and an Idiotic Idea

The chairman of the Connecticut Republican Party is dismayed by a mayor’s plan to ask state legislators to allow illegal immigrants who live in New Haven to vote in municipal elections, characterizing the proposal as a “publicity stunt.”
Connecticut Republican Party Chairman Jerry Labriola told FoxNews.com that while the organization believes in “inclusiveness,” citizenship has long been a standard requirement for voting rights.

“In fact, the right to vote in free elections is still an issue that people in many other countries continue to fight and die for,” Labriola said. “We support legal immigration and reasonable measures to provide a path to citizenship, but we don’t support providing rewards for illegal immigration.”

Continued at: Fox News

Thoughsjustoffcenter: There are lots of "sick puppies" on the left. The New Haven, CT., Mayor is another one of them. Do you want to fix this country? First follow the Consitution of the United States of America. Secondly, follow the laws! Lastly, get idiots like this out of public office. VOTE!

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Now Iran Will Have It's Chance

U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta says the dream of an independent and sovereign Iraq is now a reality, as the United States marked the end of its military mission in Iraq.

Panetta spoke Thursday at a ceremony in Baghdad, calling it a “historic occasion” for both the Iraqi and American people.

It comes weeks ahead of a December 31 deadline for the remaining U.S. soldiers to withdraw from Iraq. There were about 4,000 U.S. troops remaining in Iraq Thursday, down from as many as 170,000 at the height of the war.

Panetta said those soldiers will leave Iraq knowing they helped the Iraqi people begin a new chapter in their history that is “free from tyranny” and full of hope for prosperity and peace.

Continued at: http://visiontoamerica.org/6334/us-marks-end-to-nearly-nine-years-in-iraq/

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Well, the left is getting what it wants. The military is leaving Iraq. Just sit back and watch Iran rush in to fill the gap. 4,500 young Americans gone forever. Probably for nothing, all because Obama wants to pander to the Jane Fonda and Michael Moore crowd! This is against all concerns of the Generals that were in charge. I think that once the military is totally out of Iraq, The General Officers, and Senior Non-Commissioned Officers of all brnaches of the military should retire in protest to Obama's and Panetta's military policies. I, for one, am pissed!

Thanks for your input dingbat36!

Friday, December 16, 2011

Another Funny Found In My In Box

This has to be one of the funniest things in a long time. I think this guy should have been promoted, not fired. This is a true story from the WordPerfect Helpline, which was transcribed from a recording monitoring the customer care department.

Actual dialogue of a former WordPerfect Customer Support employee. (I know why they record these conversations!):

Operator: 'Ridge Hall, computer assistance; may I help you?'
Caller: 'Yes, well, I'm having trouble with WordPerfect .'
Operator: 'What sort of trouble?'
Caller: 'Well, I was just typing along, and all of a sudden the words went away.'
Operator: 'Went away?'
Caller: 'They disappeared'
Operator: 'Hmm. So what does your screen look like now?'
Caller: 'Nothing.'
Operator: 'Nothing??'
Caller: 'It's blank; it won't accept anything when I type.'
Operator: 'Are you still in WordPerfect, or did you get out?'
Caller: 'How do I tell?'
Operator: 'Can you see the 'C: prompt' on the screen?'
Caller: 'What's a sea-prompt?'
Operator: 'Never mind, can you move your cursor around the screen?'
Caller: 'There isn't any cursor; I told you, it won't accept anything I type..'
Operator: 'Does your monitor have a power indicator?'
Caller: 'What's a monitor?'
Operator: 'It's the thing with the screen on it that looks like a TV. Does it have a little light that tells you when it's on?'
Caller: 'I don't know.'
Operator: 'Well, then look on the back of the monitor and find wherethe power cord goes into it. Can you see that??'
Caller: 'Yes, I think so.'
Opera tor: 'Great. Follow the cord to the plug, and tell me if it'splugged into the wall..
Caller: 'Yes, it is.'
Operator: 'When you were behind the monitor, did you notice thatthere were two cables plugged into the back of it, not just one? '
Caller: 'No.'
Operator: 'Well, there are. I need you to look back there again andfind the other cable.'
Caller: 'Okay, here it is.'
Operator: 'Follow it for me, and tell me if it's plugged securely intothe back of your computer..'
Caller: 'I can't reach.'
Operator: 'OK. Well, can you see if it is?'
Caller: 'No.'
Operator: 'Even if you maybe put your knee on something and lean way over?'
Caller: 'Well, it's not because I don't have the right angle -- it's because it's dark.'
Operator: 'Dark?'
Caller: 'Yes - the office light is off, and the only light I have iscoming in from the window.'
Operator: 'Well, turn on the office light then.'
Caller: 'I can't.'
Operator: 'No? Why not?'
Caller: 'Because there's a power failure.'
Operator: 'A power .... A power failure? Aha. Okay, we've got it licked now. Do you still have the boxes and manuals and packing stuff that your computer came in?'
Caller: 'Well, yes, I keep them in the closet..'
Operator: 'Good. Go get them, and unplug your system and pack it up just like it was when you got it.
Then take it back tothe store you bought it from.'
Caller: 'Really? Is it that bad?'
Operator: 'Yes, I'm afraid it is.'
Caller: 'Well, all right then, I suppose. What do I tell them?'
Operator: 'Tell them you're too damned stupid to own a computer!'


Thoughsjustoffcenter comments: Yes - They walk amoung us. I remember a few of them very well and I still continue to run into them every once in a while. However, I don't know how old or true this is - it's funny anyway. I hope you've begun with a good laugh for the day, with more to come. Is 'WordPerfect' even around anymore? Who still uses it? Plus, we all use 'flat screens' now.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Places - I Have & Have Not Been

I have travelled the world and have been in many places, yet -

I've never been in Cahoots. Apparently, you can't go alone. You have to be in Cahoots with someone.

I've also never been in Cognito. I hear no one recognizes you there.

I have, however, been in Sane. They don't have an airport; you have to be driven there. I have made several trips there, thanks to my friends, family and work.

I would like to go to Conclusions, but you have to jump, and I'm not too much on physical activity anymore.

I have also been in Doubt. That is a sad place to go, and I try not to visit there too often.

I've been in Flexible, but only when it was very important to stand firm.

Sometimes I'm in Capable, and I go there more often as I'm getting older.
One of my favorite places to be is in Suspense! It really gets the adrenalin flowing and pumps up the old heart! At my age I need all the stimuli I can get!

And, sometimes I think I am in Vincible but life shows me I am not!

I have been in Deepshit many times; the older I get, the easier it is
to get there. I think I'm there now but can't be sure - senior moment?!?!

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

A Little Speech from 1942 by Philip Wylie

“It is a waste of words here to berate Congress. The people are doing the job. In doing it, the people are indicting themselves, of course, for the men in our Senate and the men in our House of Representatives are, indeed, the representatives of the people. Each ribald hoot at the selfishness, the arrogance, and the stupidity of our elected statesmen does not ricochet in nowhere, but bounces straight back, burning and sharp with inescapable consequence, into the bodies of the hooters: the citizens themselves, the voting public. The withered emasculation of our democratic statesmanship is the withered emasculation of America. The witch-hunting savagery of pompous sluts in our national halls is that quality of all the people. The petty greed and relentless solicitation of these quasi males is our own. The sacrifice of power, of dignity, of responsibility, of national security and interest to a little patronage of the achievement of a trivial local profit is the measure of the universal loss of aim, purpose, moral worth, view, vision, integrity, and common cause.

The appalling stupidity of these men and women, highlighted by the ferocious peril of these hours, is the exact measure of the stupidity of the people in our states, cities, towns, and villages. When we condemn them, which we rightly do with nearly every dispatch concerning their multifarious and nonsensical agenda, we condemn ourselves. When we say these men have abandoned their strength to the administration, because of pressure, we state how great has been our own eagerness to lay down the chore of civic duty and let an administration – or nobody – pick up and exploit our united strength. When we perceive that they are talking without knowing what they are talking about and doing without being able to guess the results of their acts, ignorantly busy giving unearned pensions and collecting unjust taxes, digging canals and having to fill them in, we are saying how little we, also, know or care about these matters. When we describe their pompous vanity and take exquisite pleasure in putting calipers on the immense littleness of their avarice, we are making records of our own littleness and avariciousness. When we see them knuckle to lobbies, abandon sense of the demand of minority blocs, weasel, quibble, and fail, we are watching the progress of a disease in ourselves, a democratic sickness, metastatic, and so far advanced that democracy may yet die of it – not because democracy was a mistaken plan for living together, but because the people have eschewed it out of their own greed and attached themselves to a bloc, to labor, to farms, to capital, to legionnaires, to pensioners, to states, to congressional districts, to any of a thousand gangs within our democracy – but only rarely to democracy.

By putting this small mob fealty ahead of allegiance to all of ourselves, we have steadily moved closer toward the place when mobs will fight openly to rule us, and one of them, or a group of them, may win the foray. Then they will take to fighting among each other until it becomes necessary to appoint a dictator. If that is done, the wheel will have come full turn and democratic man will again have lost his liberty, having spat upon it, abused it, laughed at it, neglected it, and so given it up because each individual man of him was not yet good enough for liberty.”

“Generation of Vipers” by Philip Wylie ©1942

Thoughtjustoffcenter comments: Thanks to "Thin Man." His research and reply concerning "The Media Protecting Obama."

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Obama's Union Goon Squad & the NLRB

ThoughtjustoffCenter: Dang, I just can get off the Obama subject today.

Excellent article if you have the time to read it. Boeing pulled their lawsuit against the NLRB and it was for a very good reason. The U.S. government have them over a barrel. All this has happened because no truthful justice is taking place in our over-reaching U.S. government agencies.

Washington Times.com

Obama and the Failure of Capitalism - ?

December 13, 2011 by Robert Ringer

Oops! The Presidential pretender went and did it again. A lot of red ink has passed over the socialist dam since he unthinkingly told Joe the Plumber that he wants to “spread the wealth around.”

Or since he told Charlie Gibson that “It’s a matter of fairness” when Gibson repeatedly asked him to explain why he would want to raise the capital-gains tax when the historical evidence proves that higher capital-gains taxes actually decrease government revenues.

Please read the rest of this article at: Conservative Byte

Thoughtsjustoffcenter: Please - Please - Please go read this article.

NBC Is Questioning Obama. Really?

Morning Joe remains the home of the overwhelming ratio of liberal to conservative guests. Even so, in recent weeks a narrative unflattering to Barack Obama has emerged around the table: Obama doesn’t like his job. He doesn’t particularly like people and is in the wrong line of work.

An even more damning appraisal was offered today: Obama doesn’t think he has failed America. He thinks America has failed him. Or as Joe Scarborough encapsulated the concept, Obama believes our version of democracy is a “stumbling block to his greatness.”

See the article and video at http://conservativebyte.com/2011/12/obama-trashed-on-nbc-news/

Thoughtsjustoffcenter comments: Hopefully the idiots are waking up. Probably not very much, but they maybe coming out of their deep sleep.

More Emails - Just Who Is Barack Obama?

Where are Barack Obama’s Girlfriends?

Think about this e-mail and see if there’s anything here you don’t believe!
I hadn’t thought about this – but where are Obama’s past girl-friends surely he had at least one orfor that matter any friends period? No past girlfriends popping up anywhere? Strange, very strange to the point of being downright weird and crazy.
OK, this is just plain old common sense, no political agendas for either side. Just common knowledge for citizens of a country, especially American citizens, who know every little tidbit about every other president (and their wives) that even know that Andrew Jackson’s wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery, or that Lincoln never went to school or Kennedy wore a back brace, or Truman played the piano.

We are Americans! Our media vets these things out! We are known for our humanitarian interests and caring for our ‘fellow man.’ We care, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.

Honestly, and this is a personal thing, but it’s continuing to bug me that no one who ever dated him has ever shown up.

Taken his charisma, which caused the women to be drawn to him so obviously during his campaign, looks like some lady would not have missed the opportunity to meet him or date him.

We all know about JFK’s magnetism, McCain was no monk, Palin’s courtship and even her athletic prowess were probed. Biden’s aneurisms are no secret. Look at Cheney and Clinton – we all know about their heart problems. How could I have left out Wild Bill before or during the White House?

Nope… not one lady has stepped up and said, “He was so shy,” or “What a great dancer!"

Now look at the rest of what we do know: no classmates, not even the recorder for the Columbia class notes ever heard of him.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Check for groomsmen. Pictures? Everyone has pictures of their wedding. Then get the pictures, or camera footage, of the graduation ceremony.

Has anyone talked to the any of the professors or why haven’t they stepped forward to tell what a great student he was – or not? Isn’t it odd that no one is bragging that they knew him, lived with him, or lived next door to him?

When did he meet Michele and how? Are there photos? Every president provides the public with all their photos, etc. for their library. What has he released? Nada – other than what was in this so-called biography! And experts, who study writing styles etc., claim it was not O’s own words or typical of his speech patterns, etc.

Does this make any of you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama’s past, saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc? NOT ONE PERSON has ever come forward.

Michelle doesn’t even talk about it. This should really be a cause for great concern.

Did you see the movie titled, The Manchurian Candidate?

Let’s face it. As insignificant as we all are, someone whom we went to school with remembers our name or face, someone remembers we were the clown, the dork, the brain, the quiet one, the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos, ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. Even George questions why no one has acknowledged that the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos was a classmate of Obama at Columbia-class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him. Since he is such a great orator, why doesn’t anyone in Obama’s college class remember him? And, why won’t he allow Columbia to release his records? Do you like millions of others; simply assume all this is explainable – even though no one can?

NOBODY REMEMBERS OBAMA AT COLUMBIA

Looking for evidence of Obama’s past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but not one remembers him. For example,Wayne Allyn Root was (like Obama) a political science major at Columbia , who graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, “I don’t know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don’t have a single classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia … EVER!

NOBODY RECALLS HIM

Root adds that he was, “Class of ’83 political science, pre-law” and says, “You don’t get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don’t know anyone who ever met him.” At our 20th class reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who’s kind of the, as we say in New York, ‘The Macha’ who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."

Obama’s photograph does not appear in the school’s yearbook, and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia. Odds are, we are in at least one of the (4-years of) class year books of where we went to school, why isn't he?

HOW CAN THIS BE

NOTE: Wayne Allyn Root can easily be verified. He graduated valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School, and then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major in the same ’83 class in which Barack Hussein Obama states he was.

SOME OTHER INTERESTING QUESTIONS

Why was Obama’s law license inactivated in 2002?

Why was Michelle’s law license inactivated by court order?

According to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama – but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases.

WHAT

The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived.

Criminally, it’s no wonder why all his records are sealed!

Please continue sending this out to everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school, before he “reorganized” Chicago, and burst upon the scene at the 2004 DemocRATic Convention, and made everyone swoon because of his charm, poise, and speaking pizzazz.

Where are his passports, how did he travel to countries that the U.S. State Department had on it's 'Do Not Travel' - 'No Travel Allowed' lists for U.S. Citizens?

This has to be the biggest cons this country has ever seen, and everyone is letting him get away with it.

This is Crazy-Scary on many levels!

Thoughtsjustoffcenter comments: Received in my email. I edited a little. These are questions that should be easy to answer, Yet, the answers can not be found. Why not? I will continue to publish this article every month, throughout the Presidential Campaign Season. Hopefully I won't forget, like a lot of the American Public.